Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

General Electric Capital Corp. v. Gainey

April 5, 2010

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARVEY N. GAINEY, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Paul L. Maloney

ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULES

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #22). Upon review of the motion, the plaintiff fails to include its attempts to obtain concurrence from the defendant. In part, W.D. Mich. LCivR 7.1(d) states:

Attempt to obtain concurrence - with respect to all motions, the moving party shall ascertain whether the motion will be opposed....All motions shall affirmatively state the efforts of the moving party to comply with the obligation created by this rule.

The Court will hold the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in abeyance until April 12, 2010, pending Plaintiff's compliance with Local Rule 7.1(d). Failure to describe, in writing, the attempt to obtain concurrence may result in denial of the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Paul L. Maloney Chief United States District Judge

20100405

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.