Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Electrical Workers' Insurance Fund v. Applied Building Technologies

April 7, 2010

ELECTRICAL WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
APPLIED BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. George Caram Steeh

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ALTERNATE SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT APPLIED BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (# 5)

Plaintiffs move for alternative service to be made upon defendant Applied Building Technologies, Inc., a/k/a Applied Building Technologies, and a/k/a Securtec Electronics Systems, Inc. (collectively "Allied"), proffering a process server's verified statement that personal service was attempted six times upon Allied's resident agent, without success, at Allied's business office at 1636 W. Fort Street, Detroit, Michigan, 48216-1915.

Service upon a corporation situated within this federal judicial district may be made pursuant to the law of Michigan. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1). Michigan law provides that "[o]n a showing that service of process cannot reasonably be made as provided by this rule, the court may by order permit service of process to be made in any other manner reasonably calculated to give the defendant actual notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard." M.C.R. 2.105(I)(1). Plaintiffs seek alternate service upon Allied by means of affixing copies of the summons, complaint, and this order to the front door of Allied's business office, or by mailing a copy of the documents by regular mail to Allied's business office and leaving a copy of the documents with any "responsible adult" at that location.

Having considered the motion and supporting documents, plaintiffs' motion for alternate service is hereby GRANTED to the extent that alternate service shall be accomplished by means of first class mail and certified mail (return receipt requested), as well as by posting a copy of the summons, complaint, and a copy of this Order at 1636 W. Fort Street, Detroit, Michigan, 48216-1915.

SO ORDERED.

GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20100407

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.