United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
March 2, 2015
Roderick Walker, Plaintiff,
Ramesh Kilaru, et al., Defendants.
Elizabeth A. Stafford, Mag. Judge
OPINION & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION  AND GRANTING DEFENDANT KILARU’S MOTION TO DISMISS  AND DEFENDANT STIEVE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Roderick Walker is a Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) inmate housed at the Thumb Correctional Facility in Lapeer, Michigan. On March 10, 2014, he filed this pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff alleges that that Drs. Kilaru and Stieve were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs based on failure to review medical records or order new testing before diagnosing him with myalgia rather than radiculopathy from degenerative disc disease, and when they stopped his Ultram prescription.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Stafford’s February 5, 2015 Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 33.) The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Dr. Kilaru’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 26) and Dr. Stieve’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 11.)
No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). The failure to object to the Report and Recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). The failure to object also relieves this Court from its duty to review this matter independently. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has nonetheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation, defendants’ motions, and the record as a whole, and agrees with the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED;
Dr. Kilaru’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED;
Dr. Stieve’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED; and
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.