United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
March 12, 2015
THOMAS OWENS, Plaintiff,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
David R. Grand, Judge.
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 
Honorable Laurie J. Michelson, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 13.) At the conclusion of his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Grand notified the parties that they were required to file any objections within fourteen days of service, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 72.1(d), and that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal.” (Report & Recommendation at 17.) No objections were filed.
The Court thus ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the findings of this Court. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); Garrison v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, No. 10-cv-13990, 2012 WL 1278044, at *8 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 16, 2012) (“The Court is not obligated to review the portions of the report to which no objection was made.” (citing Arn, 474 U.S. at 149– 52)). It follows that the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 10) and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12). A separate judgment follow.