United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
April 28, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
BRIAN J. ROMAN, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
John Corbett O’Meara, United States District Judge
Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which was filed March 2, 2015, and which has been fully briefed. Pursuant to L.R. 7.1, the court finds that oral argument is not necessary to aid in the resolution of this matter.
Plaintiff is attempting to collect a student loan debt that was disbursed to a Brian J. Roman in 1981. The loan went into default in 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on January 17, 2014 to collect the outstanding balance, which was $9, 420.20 as of that date. In response to the complaint, Defendant filed a verified answer stating that “he never entered into the alleged loan, does not know who did, does not believe he benefitted from the loan proceeds and, if he did, he was and is unaware of such, cannot read the entire purported loan agreement provided by Plaintiff and the signature appearing on said purported agreement is not Defendant’s.” Plaintiff contends that Defendant’s denial is insufficient to survive summary judgment. To grant summary judgment in Plaintiff’s favor, however, would require the court to ignore Defendant’s sworn statement. Making this type of credibility determination is precisely what the court is unable to do on summary judgment. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 252-55 (1986) (“Credibility determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions, not those of a judge.”).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.