Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Michigan

May 27, 2015

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOHN DAVID MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant

COA: 313814. Wayne CC: 12-002077-FC.

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice. Stephen J. Markman, Mary Beth Kelly, Brian K. Zahra, Bridget M. McCormack, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Justices.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 5, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1),

Page 39

in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that MRE 803(7) is not applicable under this set of facts, where defendant sought to introduce evidence that there were no recorded reports of an allegation of sexual assault. Because defendant sought to elicit testimony relating to the absence of a " matter . . . of a kind of which a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation [is] regularly made and preserved," MRE 803(7), evidence that no report was ever made was admissible " to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter," id. See United States v Gentry, 925 F.2d 186, 188 (CA 7, 1991) (analyzing [497 Mich. 1024] the rule's federal counterpart). The Court of Appeals further erred in holding that the testimony at issue was not relevant under MRE 401. As observed by the Court of Appeals concurring opinion, the evidence at issue was probative of the complainant's credibility; specifically, the complainant's claim that she had reported the abuse to her school teacher. We AFFIRM, however, the Court of Appeals holding that any error was harmless because defendant was permitted to argue that the absence of a report undermined the complainant's credibility. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.