United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
CAROL S. ELLIS WARREN, Plaintiff,
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and AI c/o IRS MO XXXXX-XXXX, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
On April 14, 2015, Plaintiff Ellis Warren filed a pro se Complaint alleging that the IRS withheld her tax refunds in 2013 and 2014 and did not credit her for amounts paid toward her taxes in 2004.
On May 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a report recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed sua sponte because Plaintiff did not show that she filed a timely refund claim with the IRS in accordance with the jurisdictional limitations set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a). Rep. & Rec. 4-5, ECF No. 6. She noted that Plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating, on the face of the complaint, that the administrative claim requirements of § 7422(a) were met. Id. at 6. Since Plaintiff did not so demonstrate, the Court is without jurisdiction to adjudicate her claims against the IRS. Judge Morris recommended dismissing those claims without prejudice. As to the Department of Homeland Security, which Plaintiff also names as a defendant, Judge Morris recommended that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The complaint, Judge Morris observed, contains no allegations against DHS, nor does it explain how DHS fits into Plaintiff's allegations.
Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 6, is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Department of Homeland Security.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of jurisdiction ...