United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
July 29, 2015
STEPHANIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
CHASE BANK, JP MORGAN CHASE, JAMIE DIMON, MATTHEW E. ZAMES, MIRIANNA LAKE, DANA S. DEASY, PAUL H. COMPTON, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, R. K. ARNOLD, BILL HUFFMAN, TROTT & TROTT, P.C., DAVID A. TROTT, JAMES W. BATCHELOR, MELISSA S. BYRD, STEVEN A. JACOBS, and FLAGSTAR BANK, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the report issued on July 8, 2015 by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #17] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that defendants R.K. Arnold, Paul H. Compton, Dana S. Deasy, Jamie Dimon, Bill Huffman, Mirianna Lake, and Matthew E. Zames's motion to dismiss [dkt. #5] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that defendants R.K. Arnold, Chase Bank, Paul H. Compton, Dana S. Deasy, Jamie Dimon, Bill Huffman, JP Morgan Chase, Mirianna Lake, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, and Matthew E. Zames's motion to dismiss [dkt. #6] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that defendants James W. Batachelor, Melissa S. Byrd, Steven A. Jacobs, David A. Trott, and Trott & Trott, P.C.'s motion to dismiss [dkt. #8] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that defendant Flagstar's motion to dismiss [dkt. #12] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.