Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Kiani

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

January 25, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
AMEER JAN KIANI, Defendant.

          ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELEASE FROM GOVERNMENT CUSTODY AS PREMATURE

          THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge

         Defendant Ameer Jan Kiani was charged with the felony offense of Threats Against Former Presidents, 18 U.S.C. § 879. He was found to be Not Guilty Only by Reason of Insanity of the offense on May 5, 2015. ECF No. 19. Kiani was then committed to the custody of the Attorney General until Kiani could establish that his release would not create a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to another or serious damage to property of another. ECF No. 20. Kiani was hospitalized at the Federal Medical Center - Devens in Massachusetts.

         On March 21, 2017, the Court received the Federal Medical Center's Risk Assessment Panel Report for 2017. That Report concluded that Kiani had recovered sufficiently to be released, but only pursuant to a conditional release plan. The Report did not provide a conditional release plan or indicate whether one would be forthcoming from the Panel. On April 18, 2017, the Court corresponded with the Panel. In the letter, the Court explained that 18 U.S.C. § 4243 requires the director of the facility where a person has been hospitalized to certify that the committed person no longer poses a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious damage to property and also certify that a prescribed regimen is appropriate, if conditional release pursuant to such a regimen is necessary. The Court requested the Panel to confirm that a conditional release plan was being prepared.

         In May 2017, the Court received an email from defense counsel which indicated that the details of a conditional release plan were being finalized. Because no further information was received, the Court ordered the parties to submit a status report by July 17, 2017. ECF No. 44. The Government's status report indicated that a conditional release plan had not been finalized but was the subject of considerable effort and would be forthcoming. On July 18, 2017, Kiani filed a third motion for release. ECF No. 45. In the motion, Kiani, by counsel, indicated that the hospital employee (not identified) “in charge of Defendant's care plan finally . . . indicated he was not satisfied with the family's plan.” Id. at 1. Defense counsel then contended that the Government proposed a “groups home scenario” for the conditional release plan, but Kiani indicated that his family was financially unable to pay for a spot in a group home. Kiani also questioned the necessity of certain aspects of the conditional group plan.

         On July 26, 2017, the Court issued an order scheduling a hearing on Kiani's motions for release and directing representatives from the hospital to appear in Bay City, Michigan. ECF No. 46. On September 18, 2017, that hearing was held. Dr. Channell, the Chair of the Risk Assessment Panel which authored the report received on March 21, 2017, and Jennifer Lee Ramos, a social worker responsible for identifying a placement for Kiani, were present. During the hearing, the Court was provided with new information, including Dr. Channell's belief that Kiani could only safely be released to an in-patient psychiatric facility with the resources to provide significant oversight for Kiani. Ms. Ramos then detailed her extensive efforts to find a placement for Kiani which met that criteria, indicating that limited options exist. Specifically, Ms. Ramos explained that most eligible facilities have limited space and that many facilities are unwilling to consider Kiani given his psychological circumstances and criminal record. But Ms. Ramos did identify one facility in northern Michigan (North County Community Mental Health) that was willing to consider admitting Kiani, subject to an interview. Arrangements were made for Kiani to be interviewed by a representative of that facility while he was still in Michigan. After the Court scheduled a telephonic status conference for October 23, 2017, the hearing was adjourned.

         On October 23, 2017, that telephonic status conference was held. The Court was informed that North County Community Mental Health had interviewed Kiani and determined that it was not equipped to provide the level of care he requires. Specifically, the report found that Kiani required “Medically Managed Residential Services which is the most intense level of care on continuum.” Oct. 13, 2017, Interview Rep at 1. The report further stated that “[t]raditionally this level of care is provided in hospital settings, but could, in some cases, be provided in free-standing non-hospital setting.” Id. A follow-up status conference was scheduled for November 7, 2017, to give all parties an opportunity to review the report.

         On October 30, 2017, Kiani filed a fourth motion for release. ECF No. 51. In that motion, Kiani challenges the Government's contention that he has a history of violence. Kiani also strongly opposes the Government's suggestion that Kiani might need to be released to a facility outside of Michigan (or at least not in the northern part of Michigan, where Kiani's family resides). Kiani asserts that, contrary to the Government's contention, his family could provide a strong support system which would be adequate to enable his recovery. Kiani requests an evidentiary hearing so that Kiani's mother could explain why he should be released directly to his family.

         On November 7, 2017, a telephonic status conference was held where Kiani's attorney reasserted his belief that Kiani was not dangerous and could safely be released to live with his mother. Approximately one week later, the Court issued an order denying Kiani's four pending motions for release as premature. ECF No. 53. In that order, the Court both summarized the applicable standards which apply to Kiani's hospitalization and eventual release and, further, explained that the “statute does not contemplate a sua sponte discharge in the absence of a medical recommendation that it is safe to do so.” Id. at 5.

         Now, Kiani has filed yet another motion for release. ECF No. 54. He has also filed an addendum to that motion. ECF No. 55. In the motion, Kiani identifies no material facts which have changed since the Court's last opinion. That motion, like Kiani's prior motions, is premature and will be denied. In the addendum, Kiani alleges that the Government hospital has conducted its yearly review of Kiani's progress and requests a copy of the report. Last year, the annual report was issued in mid-March. Therefore, it is unclear why Kiani believes the report has already been prepared. Even if it has, the Government has provided that report to the Court (and Kiani) in past years. There is no reason to believe that the Government has failed to do so in this instance (in fact, the Government appears to have a statutory obligation to file any such report with the Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243(f)). No. conditional release program has been developed yet, and so Kiani's requests are premature and redundant.

         Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Kiani's motion for release, ECF No. 54, is DENIED as premature and for the reasons stated in the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.