United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION TO VACATE UNDER 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1990, Defendant/Petitioner Quentin Burt was convicted by a
jury of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute
cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and
846, aiding and abetting the use and carrying of machine guns
during drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 2 and 924(c), using and carrying non-machine gun
firearms during drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 924(c), aiding and abetting the unlawful possession of
unregistered machine gun in violation of 26 U.S.C. §
5861(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and being a felon in
possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
922(g). Prior to sentencing, Court vacated Petitioner's
conviction on the § 924(c) count that did not involve
machine guns. Petitioner was sentenced to 495 months
imprisonment. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
affirmed Petitioner's conviction and sentence. United
States v. Sims, 975 F.2d 1225 (6th Cir. 1992).
the Court is Petitioner's “Motion to Vacate Count
I” (Doc. 439). As will be explained, because Petitioner
has filed prior motions to vacate, the motion must be
transferred to the Sixth Circuit for a determination of
whether Petitioner may pursue the grounds raised in the
1992, after the Sixth Circuit affirmed his conviction and
sentence, Petitioner filed a joint motion to vacate under
§ 2255 with his co-defendants. In September of 1993,
Petitioner filed a separate § 2255 motion. The Court
denied both motions. See Order filed November 9,
January 11, 1995, Petitioner filed another § 2255 motion
which the Court denied. See Order filed February 6,
1995. Petitioner appealed. The Sixth Circuit affirmed.
Burt v. United States, 1995 WL 603317
(6th Cir. Oct. 12, 1995).
December of 1996, Petitioner filed a fourth § 2255
motion. The Court denied the motion and a certificate of
appealability. See Memorandum and Order filed June
14, 1999 and Order Denying Certificate of Appealability filed
July 21, 1999. The Sixth Circuit also denied a certificate of
appealability. Burt v. United States, No. 99-1895
(6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2000).
4, 2001, Petitioner filed a motion to file a second or
successive § 2255 motion in the Sixth Circuit. While
that motion was pending, Petitioner filed a motion under
§ 2241 in the district court. The Sixth Circuit denied
Petitioner's motion. In re Quentin Burt, No.
01-1750 (6th Cir. Nov. 2, 2001).
March 6, 2002, the Court denied the § 2241 motion.
See Opinion and Order Granting Respondent's
Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Petitioner appealed. The Sixth Circuit affirmed. Burt v.
United States, 2003 WL244997 (6th Cir. Jan.
2004, Petitioner filed a “Memorandum and Support of
Motion to Vacate or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. §
2255.” That motion was Petitioner's fifth §
2255 motion and seventh attempt to obtain collateral review
of his conviction. The Court transferred the motion to the
Sixth Circuit. (Doc. 415). The Sixth Circuit denied
permission to pursue the motion. See Doc. 417.
Petitioner has filed his sixth § 2255 motion, contending
he is entitled to a reduction in his sentence “in the
interest of fairness.”
a successive motion to vacate sentence is filed in a federal
district court, a Petitioner must first file a motion with
the appropriate court of appeals requesting permission to
file a second or successive motion to vacate sentence. 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); see also In Re Hanserd,
123 F.3d 922, 934 (6th Cir. 1997). Where, as here, a
successive motion to vacate sentence is erroneously filed
with the district court, the district court is required to
transfer the motion to the court of appeals under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1631. Id. (citing In Re Sims, 111
F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997)).
the motion is TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit under 28
U.S.C. § 1631 for a determination of whether Petitioner
is entitled to a certificate of authorization to file a