Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Eighty-Two Thousand

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

April 9, 2019

United States of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Eighty-Two Thousand, Three Hundred Dollars $82, 300 in U.S. Currency, Defendant in Rem. Demond Gibson, Claimant.

          Matthew Schneider United States Attorney Shankar Ramamurthy Assistant United States Attorney

          Christopher W. Quinn II Attorney for Claimant

          STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO CLAIMANT DEMOND GIBSON

          Honorable Hon. Terrence Berg, United States District Judge.

         Plaintiff, the United States of America (hereinafter the “United States”), by and through its counsel, Matthew Schneider, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, and Shankar Ramamurthy, Assistant United States Attorney, and Demond Gibson, by and through his attorney, Christopher W. Quinn II, Esq., (collectively, “the Parties”) enter into this Stipulation and Agreement for Entry of Consent Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture as to Defendant in rem Eighty-Two Thousand, Three Hundred Dollars ($82, 300) in U.S. Currency, Defendant in rem, under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth:

         1. Officers with the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) seized the Defendant in rem on or about January 29, 2018 at the Detroit Metropolitan Airport in Romulus, Wayne County, Michigan.

         2. Demond Gibson, (“Claimant”) filed an administrative claim and Petition for Remission or Mitigation with the DEA, and thereafter, DEA referred the matter to the United States Attorney's Office for judicial forfeiture.

         3. On June 11, 2018, the United States of America filed a verified Complaint for Forfeiture against the Defendant in rem, pursuant to 21 U.S.C § 881(a)(6). (ECF No. 1).

         4. On July 10, 2018, Claimant Demond Gibson, through counsel, filed a an Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint for Forfeiture. (ECF No. 5).

         5. On July 11, 2018, Claimant Demond Gibson, through counsel, filed a Motion and Brief to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Forfeiture in rem. (ECF No. 6). The United States filed a Response to the Motion to Dismiss on July 11, 2018. (ECF No. 7).

         6. On July 30, 2018, Claimant Demond Gibson, through counsel, filed a Verified Claim. (ECF No. 9).

         7. The United States filed its Declaration of Publication of the civil judicial forfeiture action on or about August 14, 2018. (ECF No. 10).

         8. The United States filed a Motion to Strike the Claim on August 30, 2018 (ECF No. 14), to which Claimant filed a Response to on September 7, 2018. (ECF No. 16). The United States filed its Reply in Support of United States' Motion to Strike Claim and Dismiss Interest on September 12, 2018. (ECF No. 17). The Court entered an Order Denying Government's Motion to Dismiss Claim for Lack of Standing and Denying Claimant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint on March 11, 2019. (ECF No. 18).

         9. No other verified claims of interest to the Defendant in rem have been filed in this judicial action, and the time for filing such pleadings has expired. Plaintiff, the United States of America, and Claimant Demond Gibson, by and through his attorney, Christopher W. Quinn II, (“the parties”) wish to resolve this matter without further litigation and expense.

         NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.