United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
OLYMPUS SERVICES, LLC d/b/a PROJECT MANAGEMENT TRAINING, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
TRENTON GREENER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY  (DOC. 9)
AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A PROPOSED INJUNCTION ORDER
AND STATEMENT OF DAMAGES
COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
an employment case. Plaintiff Olympus Services, LLC d/b/a
Project Management Training Institute is suing defendant
Trenton Greener alleging he violated a non-compete
provision in his employment agreement, failed to return
plaintiff's property, and disseminated plaintiff's
confidential information. The complaint seeks damages and
injunctive relief and asserts the following claims:
Count I - breach of contract
Count II - common law conversion
Count III - statutory conversion
Count IV - unjust enrichment
Count V - injunctive relief
filed an answer and counterclaim alleging breach of contract.
the Court is plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on
liability.Defendant has not responded to the motion
and the time for responding has long passed. Accordingly, the
Court will proceed to decision on the motion based on
plaintiff's motion papers. For the reasons that follow, the
motion will be granted.
court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that
there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the
movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). A moving party may meet that burden
“by ‘showing' - that is, pointing out to the
district court -- that there is an absence of evidence to
support the nonmoving party's case.” Celotex
Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986).
Rule 56 also provides the consequences of failing to properly
support or address a fact:
party fails to properly support an assertion of fact or fails
to properly address another party's assertion of fact ...