Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Estate of Taylor v. University Physician Group

Court of Appeals of Michigan

July 25, 2019

ESTATE OF EFFIE TAYLOR, by ORAS TAYLOR, Personal Representative, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, LEGACY SHGD, VHS SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL, INC., TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., VHS PHYSICIANS OF MICHIGAN, DMC LAHSER AMBULATORY, and DMC LAHSER CAMPUS, Defendants and FRANKLIN MEDICAL CONSULTANTS, PC, and MANUEL SKLAR, Defendants-Appellants.

         THIS OPINION IS UNCORRECTED AND SUBJECT TO REVISION BEFORE FINAL PUBLICATION IN THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS REPORTS.

          Oakland Circuit Court. LC No. 2015-147003-NH.

         COUNSEL:

          For TAYLOR ORAS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, Plaintiff-Appellee: MARK R. BENDURE.

          For FRANKLIN MEDICAL CONSULTANTS PC, MANUEL SKLAR, Defendants-Appellants: ANITA COMORSKI.

          For SHGD LEGACY, VHS SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL INC, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, VHS OF MICHIGAN INC, VHS PHYSICIANS OF MICHIGAN, DMC LAHSER AMBULATORY, DMC LAHSER CAMPUS, Defendants: ANITA COMORSKI.

          Before: GLEICHER, P.J., and STEPHENS and O'BRIEN, JJ. O'BRIEN, J. (dissenting).

         OPINION

Page 673

         [329 Mich.App. 270] Elizabeth L. Gleicher, P.J.

          This medical malpractice case arises from a colonoscopy performed by defendant Manuel [329 Mich.App. 271] Sklar, M.D., on plaintiff's decedent, Effie Taylor. During the procedure, Dr. Sklar observed lesions in Taylor's colon that he believed were arteriovenous malformations, called AVMs. Dr. Sklar biopsied the suspected AVMs. Three days later, Taylor developed colorectal bleeding. Despite the emergent removal of her entire colon, Taylor died.

         Plaintiff claims that Dr. Sklar breached the standard of care by biopsying the AVMs, particularly since Taylor had recently taken Plavix, a blood thinner, and was a devout Jehovah's Witness who refused

Page 674

blood transfusions. Plaintiff's expert witness, Dr. Todd Eisner, testified that the improper and unindicated biopsies caused the bleeding that ultimately led to Taylor's death.

          Sklar's defense focuses on causation. His expert witness, Dr. Veslav Stecevic, performed an emergent colonoscopy on Taylor the day before she died, looking for the source of the bleeding in her colon. According to Dr. Stecevic, the bleeding originated at the site of a ruptured diverticulum, which Dr. Stecevic opined, was wholly incidental to the biopsies and a " random" event. Defendants assert that Dr. Stecevic's testimony must be believed. Crediting Dr. Stecevic, defendants reason, demands the entry of summary disposition in favor of Dr. Sklar.

          The circuit court disagreed, and so do we. Given Dr. Sklar's testimony that he biopsied AVMs and Dr. Eisner's reasonable explanation that the biopsy of the AVMs likely caused Taylor's hemorrhage, Dr. Stecevic's testimony creates a fact question regarding the source of the fatal bleeding. As in every case involving eyewitness testimony, a jury is free to [329 Mich.App. 272] believe or disbelieve the witness's account. That the eyewitness is a physician does not defeat this rule.

          I

          At his deposition, Dr. Sklar acknowledged awareness that Taylor, a 79-year-old woman and a Jehovah's Witness, had been taking Plavix before the colonoscopy. He instructed her to discontinue the Plavix five to seven days before the procedure; according to the medical record, Taylor stopped taking the drug only three days before. Dr. Eisner opined that Taylor still had Plavix in her system at the time of the colonoscopy, " which would be another reason not to take biopsies in a Jehovah's Witness, especially of what he thought was an AVM."

          Dr. Sklar dictated the official operative report on the day of the colonoscopy. He noted that a segment of Taylor's ascending colon " had an appearance of multiple small blood vessels suggestive for an extensive AVM malformation." The report continues, " Biopsies were taken." Dr. Sklar's " final diagnoses," as recorded in the medical record, were " [d]iverticulosis and arteriovenous malformations." At his deposition, Dr. Sklar repeatedly confirmed that he biopsied " a vascular lesion" (an AVM is an abnormal collection of coalesced blood vessels). Dr. Sklar's records do not support that he biopsied a diverticulum, and he did not report any diverticular bleeding.

          Three days after the colonoscopy, Taylor presented at Beaumont Hospital with rectal bleeding. An angiogram failed to locate the bleeding's source. Dr. Stecevic performed a colonoscopy to locate the source of the blood and to stem its flow. He claimed that he did not see any AVMs during his examination of Taylor's colon and asserted that there were none. According to Dr. [329 Mich.App. 273] Stecevic, Dr. Sklar had not biopsied an AVM, despite that Dr. Sklar's records and testimony support that he did:

Q . Do you believe that Dr. Sklar biopsied an [AVM]?
A . No.
Q . Why?
A . Because there was no [AVM].

          In Dr. Stecevic's opinion, Taylor was bleeding from a diverticulum, which is a " deep pocket" in the intestinal wall. That Taylor was bleeding from a diverticulum three days after undergoing biopsies of her colon was " simply a coincidence," Dr. Stecevic opined, because a bleeding diverticulum is a " random event."

Page 675

          Dr. Stecevic recorded that he found " [r]ed blood . . . in the entire colon" during the second colonoscopy, and performed a " [l]imited exam due to large amount of blood in the entire colon." Dr. Stecevic injected epinephrine into what he thought was a bleeding diverticulum. He noted that this successfully staunched the hemorrhage coming from Taylor's colon. But Taylor continued to bleed. To try to save her life, a surgeon removed her entire colon. Dr. Stecevic conceded that ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.